How the CHL and USHL merger will change the game of hockey – The Hockey Writers – NHL Prospects
When the NCAA lifts its ban on collegiate players in the Canadian Hockey League (CHL) in November 2024, major youth hockey will undergo a sea change. The CHL will no longer be considered professional, allowing players to join Division I programs starting in the 2025-26 season. The change ensured player movement between the CHL and the NCAA, sparking a battle to recruit and retain talent. One end result that seems destined to happen is the merger of the top junior leagues.
RELATED: 2025 Under-17 World Hockey Challenge – Gold Medal Game
The NHL, USA Hockey, Hockey Canada, CHL and all three of their member leagues held high-level meetings in New York, Le Journal du Québec reported. During the two-day summit, they discussed the future of NHL player development and the changing landscape after CHL players became eligible for the NCAA this season.
The discussion focused on the United States Hockey League (USHL) becoming part of the CHL, but neither side was willing to say that was about to become a reality. However, if the NHL is able to broker a merger, it will change the game of hockey in North America.
change of rules
NCAA rule changes have forced every junior hockey league in North America to adjust their approach to the sport, recruiting, business and the players themselves. The new rule is bringing a major shift to the game of hockey as it opens the door to college careers for CHL players, not just after their junior careers are over. In some cases, this resulted in them shortening their time in the CHL.
Well-known and highly regarded prospects such as Gavin McKenna, Porter Martone and Keaton Verhoeff all jumped to the NCAA with a few seasons of CHL eligibility remaining.
There are several reasons for wanting to make a change: One main reason is money. Even though there are some restrictions on using VISA to pay Canadian players, the ability to earn change is an important factor for players. This choice does mean that top prospects may face a decision: make money immediately or stay in the NHL’s traditional channels and hope for a payday later.
Another reason is the perception of the strength of the league and its impact on player development. The average age of a CHL player is around 18; in the NCAA, the number is closer to 22. That means players who make the jump to the NCAA will be playing against older players who are 23 or 24 years old. They are more mature mentally, physically, and have more experience.
It’s a challenge for the 17- and 18-year-olds coming out of the CHL to face players who can effectively play a pro-style game and be able to do it in an NHL-level facility. All of these are viewed as advantages for the development of younger, more elite prospects.
Add to this the fact that their schedule is more relaxed, with fewer games, more practices and more training time, and many young players are starting to see the advantages in their physical development. Historically, the NCAA and CHL have been rivals, competing for the same players. That’s still the case, but now (with the rule changes) it’s a completely new process with a lot of unknowns, so it helps to open the lines of communication.
merge
To be clear, it is in the best interest of the NHL to have strong youth hockey in the United States and Canada. They don’t want to see the NHL completely diluted. They also gave CHL a lot of money, and CHL must not want to lose this money.
Therefore, a merger is in the best interest of the NHL, and because they are the ultimate destination for players and provide money to the league, providing them with their greatest asset, there is also an incentive for these leagues to find solutions and simplify and create a standard set of rules through the merger.
Fundamental changes in the sport’s business remain dynamic and have yet to form reliable patterns. Work continues behind the scenes as NCAA recruiters build relationships with CHL front office staff, player agents and others.
According to one of my sources on NCAA recruiting, they are “building relationships with as many executives and coaches as possible to avoid animosity as they get to the bottom of the youth talent pool. It’s not just about explaining the eligibility implications of the sport and academics to CHL players. It’s about selling the NHL on the best path for players to develop.”
The USHL-CHL merger will create a single, dominant developmental path for most North American youth hockey prospects, although the impact on player development is complex and multifaceted. Changes in NCAA rules allowing CHL players to become eligible for college have significantly altered the youth hockey landscape, further adding to the complexity of any potential merger.
The benefits of this are multiple, such as creating the best possible competition by integrating talent and ensuring that North America’s top prospects can continue to compete against each other. This concentrated competition can accelerate the development of elite players. It also standardizes the game. A single governing body would be able to enforce consistent standards in terms of rules, coaching, facilities and player development support.
The benefits may be greatest for teams in the smaller markets of the two leagues. One issue that keeps coming up is the ease with which clubs in the larger markets can recruit players, as we have historically seen players drafted into these markets hold out by threatening to go to other leagues. By merging, it will eliminate that option. It would unify player rights rules and modernize the draft and waiver dispersion systems.
Additionally, this will benefit smaller markets that currently suffer from lower margins, smaller talent pools, and lower brand exposure due to expanded resources, increased visibility, and competitive balance.
However, USHL clubs need to overcome some significant hurdles, such as operating budgets (personnel, travel, arena, marketing) and investments in player development and community programs that must meet the strict minimum standards required by the CHL to maintain its brand. The American Hockey League’s historic role as the “gateway to college hockey” is now meaningless.
Players can no longer threaten to go to the USHL to force CHL clubs to trade their rights. This means the CHL benefits because the top 16 and 17 year olds do have fewer options. However, once they turn 18 and are eligible to enter college, players can move more fluidly between major college and university systems, giving them once again more control over their developmental paths.
Possible negative effects
The existing two-tier system has historically provided players with multiple opportunities to find the right fit, whether on the junior college or college-affiliated route. The merger could eliminate some avenues for players like Nate Schmidt of the Utah Mammoths (who won a Stanley Cup title with the Florida Panthers last season) and Neal Pionk of the Winnipeg Jets to benefit.
The NCAA (and by extension the USHL) has historically focused on developing late-bloomer players, while the CHL has been more of a “direct-to-pro” outlet. Merging leagues may dilute these unique development concepts.
A USHL-CHL merger/partnership would pose a significant challenge to independent leagues like the British Columbia Hockey League (BCHL), which has historically been a key pathway to the NCAA. There will be a brain drain as a large number of elite prospects who previously took the BCHL route will no longer have to opt out of the CHL.
This will reduce the overall quality of their play and mean the players will be less visible as they will no longer be on the radar of scouts or recruiters. The snowball effect is that fewer players are recruited, which means fewer players choose to go the BCHL route. Their only hope of survival is to assume the role of a late-blooming feeder league, and to do that they need to adapt and change the rules, such as raising the eligibility age.
There are also geographical complications. CHL Draft The regional structure of the existing league will create logistical challenges. For example, the Western Hockey League (WHL) claims a large swath of territory that overlaps with USHL teams in the Midwest and Pacific Northwest. The merger would require a massive realignment of geographic areas, but it could also force a difficult realignment of geographic boundaries that could increase travel burdens for teams and players.
NHL draft model could change
The NHL Draft has benefited from two competing youth hockey models. The merger will bring significant changes to scouting, draft strategy and draft picks. The merged league will need standardized rules regarding signing windows and player rights. Currently, player rights are valid for two years for CHL players and four years for NCAA players.
NHL clubs want to eliminate the possibility of losing players, especially NCAA draft players, who have the option of signing anywhere as unrestricted free agents (UFA) after waiting four years. If an NHL team fails to sign an NCAA player before the rights expire (usually four years after the draft or 30 days after college), the team may receive compensatory draft picks only if the player is selected in the first round.
Once the NHL can figure this out, scouting and talent evaluation will become much simpler. Teams can now look to a unified talent pool and no longer have to adjust their search based on the level of competition.
The merger of the USHL and CHL will fundamentally reshape the landscape of youth hockey in North America. While it could create a more focused and elite development path for top prospects, it would also create significant challenges for junior league franchise owners in terms of player paths, drafting strategies and financial stability.
Recent NCAA rule changes have added new complexities to the youth hockey environment, and any potential merger must carefully navigate these new dynamics to ensure the long-term health of youth hockey.
